India’s fast bowling legacy in recent years has often been summed up by two names: Mohammed Shami and Jasprit Bumrah. While both are indispensable assets for Team India, their styles, roles, peaks and career trajectories differ. In many discussions, fans and analysts ask: “Who is better?”
In this updated blog, we will compare their careers across formats (Tests, ODIs, T20/IPL). Apart from that, we will also take a closer look at their goals, strengths and weaknesses to make a final decision.
First, let’s include the new information as framing:
These recent events and records show how the race between them is still evolving, not static.
Below is a structured comparison incorporating classical statistics and the latest data.
Metric | Mohammed Shami | Jasprit Bumrah |
---|---|---|
Innings Bowled | 122 | 95 |
Wickets Taken | 229 | 226 |
Overs Bowled | 1919 | 1609 |
Maidens | 364 | 379 |
Runs Conceded | 6346 | 4483 |
Economy Rate | 3.31 | 2.78 |
Best Bowling | 6/56 | 6/27 |
This suggests that in red-ball cricket, Bumrah was stronger (at least in that snapshot).
Metric | Mohammed Shami | Jasprit Bumrah |
---|---|---|
Innings Bowled | 107 | 88 |
Wickets Taken | 206 | 149 |
Overs Bowled | 887 | 763 |
Maidens | 52 | 57 |
Runs Conceded | 4955 | 3509 |
Economy Rate | 5.58 | 4.60 |
Best Bowling | 7/57 | 6/19 |
Overall, in ODIs, it’s close: Shami is more aggressive, Bumrah is more economical. Also, in the World Cup and ICC tournaments, Shami’s performance is different. In the 2023 World Cup, he had a great performance (23 wickets in 6 matches, several 5-wickets). Bumrah was good in that tournament but statistically lagged behind him.
Metric | Mohammed Shami | Jasprit Bumrah |
---|---|---|
Innings Bowled | 25 | 74 |
Wickets Taken | 27 | 96 |
Overs Bowled | 85 | 269 |
Maidens | 1 | 12 |
Runs Conceded | 761 | 1714 |
Economy Rate | 8.95 | 6.36 |
Best Bowling | 3/15 | 3/7 |
In T20 Internationals, Jasprit has clearly been better than Shami, with his economy rate (6.36 vs 8.95) being significantly better in almost three times the number of matches. Bumrah’s superior control and consistency make him India’s go-to bowler in the shorter format.
T20 is more difficult due to the smaller sample size, changing roles and match conditions. But a few observations:
In the IPL, Bumrah’s consistency has been mentioned repeatedly in media reports over the years. (e.g. his best stats, economy, etc.)
Read More: Rohit Sharma vs Shubman Gill: Who Is Better? Batting & Stats Comparison
After comparing the stats, let’s revisit the qualitative factors, now with new milestones and records in mind.
Because of these role differences, Bumrah’s consistency and his ability to keep control become more valuable in many games.
Such records show how both consistency and sometimes distance shape public perception.
With all the above data, if anyone has to pick a better bowler overall, it is Jasprit Bumrah. His consistency, ability across formats and control have truly made him an excellent bowler among all the other Indian players. But Mohammed Shami is not far behind; in fact, he can surpass Bumrah in certain matches or tournaments.
As of the end of September 2025, Jasprit Bumrah has surpassed Shami in the list of wicket-takers for India across all formats. He is now on 464 wickets at an average of 20.61, while Shami has 462 wickets.
Shami sometimes bowls very costly spells (especially on flat pitches). One notable lapse is in the Champions Trophy where he bowled 5 wides and took 11 balls to complete an over. Bumrah has a back injury which has led to him missing the tournament (e.g. Champions Trophy 2025)